Human autonomy

Humans and autonomy: a topic that has a long history in debate, philosophical discussions, academic writing and literature. And, of course, stories and movies. User-centered innovation employs a pragmatic definition of ‘human autonomy’. This definition supports the analysis of humans: how they behave in solutions in which many different humans and machines participate. In user-centered innovation: “Autonomy is the right to decide what to do, when, where, for whom, with which resources.”

Autonomy is the right to decide what to do, when, where, for whom, with which resources.

User-Centered Innovation employs a pragmatic definition of autonomy.

From the perspective of user-centered innovation it is recognised that humans that participate in one solution are also engaged in other solutions and tasks, jobs, activities, et cetera. The participation of a human in one solution may be to fulfill a bigger purpose, unknown to the participants in that other particular solution. Many factors influence how a human behaves within a solution: Although the solution may prescribe certain behaviour, a participant may have reasons to behave differently…

This pragmatic definition of autonomy is in accordance with studies that show that increased human autonomy has a positive effect on well-being and (job) performance. Basically, allowing more autonomy provides a human with more possible behaviours to handle ordinary, and out-of-the-ordinary situations. The reverse, namely restricting autonomy (or even: micromanaging) ensures that it becomes difficult to adapt to changes.

Studies also show that autonomy is not a panacee: the person needs to have the knowledge, experience, skills and opportunity to be able to act autonomously. Consider the example of driving a motorcycle from Delft to Paris in five hours: I only can fulfill this task autonomously if I can actually drive a motorcycle, have a license, know the route, have a motorcycle, et cetera. (Note: I cannot drive a motorcycle so I am not qualified to autonomously undertake this activity.)

 For successful user-centered innovations it is key to guarantee the autonomy of the participants.

 A non-exhaustive list of starting points to read more on human autonomy:

  • Autonomy is related to ‘morality’ and ‘free will’. Quick starting points are the wikipedia pages on Immanuel Kant and René Descartes.
  • Overview of the concept of Autonomy on Wikipedia.
  • Dictionary definition of Autonomy on Wiktionary.
  • Stories and movies: There are too many! Consider stories about a person, group, or country to gain independence, about being able to make their own decisions, about creating choices in their life.
  • Interesting read on autonomy and human performance by Ozer, M. (2011). A Moderated Mediation Model of the Relationship Between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6):1328-1336, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023644. Summarised by e.g. Bret Simmons (SoundCloud)
  • Autonomy and well-being: interesting read by
    • Fischer, R. & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101:164-184. DOI: 10.1037/a0023663. Summarised by e.g. Rick Nauert (PsychCentral) and available at ResearchGate.
  • Autonomy depends on the person and the task: see for example more on Situational Leadership theory on Wikipedia.