Innovative solutions guarantee the autonomy of their participants
In the past 20 years we’ve engineered socio-technical solutions in which both humans and machines participate. Examples abound, e.g. social-apps, public transit electronic ticketing, B2B e-commerce, online shops. You’d think we now know how to make it work, right? Well… often we do not. So, what’s happening?
When investigating successful innovations the key ingredient is that these solutions guarantee the autonomy of the involved humans and machines. Guaranteeing autonomy requires thinking in terms of added-value among participants in the system: Delivered added-value ought to match with desired added-value. User-centered innovation starts with commonsense and is technically feasible.
NEXES blog series on Key Performance Indicators
Within the NEXES Action the need arose to address the proverbial challenge of “Comparing Apples and Oranges”. Instead of imposing a strict set of key performance indicators (KPIs), a more flexible approach was adopted. These flexible KPIs are defined to respect the autonomy of the involved parties. A series of six articles has been written that discuss the challenge, explain how not to compare apples and oranges, and describe the adopted solution to compare apples, oranges and any other fruit. Read more… See also the animations on YouTube NEXES NG112.
Recent blog posts
|The most recent blog posts are:||
Do you wish to see the overview of blog posts?
Focusing on all participants in the solution
In user-centered innovation the focus is on the entire ‘solution’ in which both humans and machines participate. Here, ‘solution’ refers to a socio-technical system where the joint actions of the humans and machines drive the overall performance. The solution is in place to resolve a ‘problem’ that would otherwise exist. This problem can be real (as in, an explicit need for a service or product) or implicit (as in, that a potential client was not yet aware of a service or product). Read more…
Benefits & Investment
- Greater appreciation of the solution and overall performance.
- Greater accommodation of individual differences in humans and machines.
- Solution is built to change: straightforward to add/remove/update participating humans and/or machines.
For additional benefits and the required investment: Read more…
Autonomy is a concept with many nuances. Here, autonomy is meant to mean: the entity itself decides what to work on, when, where, for whom and with which resources. This kind of self-governance is well-known to be very important. The mechanisms by which autonomy is manifested are, of course, quite different between humans and machines. Yet, by explicitly recognising that both have autonomy it becomes simpler to analyse, design, model and realize useful solutions. Read more…
When interacting with autonomous participants it makes sense to make the content of the interaction ‘worthwhile’ for these participants. After all, there is a reason why this interaction takes place. That reason is about the perception of added-value: the involved participants get ‘something’ out of the interaction that they like (or desire, need, must have to complete a task, etc.). Added-value is a subjective opinion: each participant has an individual opinion on whether ‘something’ has added-value. Read more…
User-centered innovation is accompanied by a methodology that makes explicit what needs to be improved to arrive at a higher performance level of the solution. This methodology takes all participants into account and aims for a joint prioritisation of improvements. The user-centered innovation methodology does not prescribe beforehand how to build or adapt your behaviour, machines, and/or participation in the solution. Rather, when applying this methodology each participant is enabled to understand the relationships with other participants and the areas for improvement. Each participant can, and should, continue to use their own priorities, metrics, workflows, development cycles, et cetera. Read more…